The idea of a machine handing down rulings sounds like something out of a science fiction movie. Yet with the rise of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the recent Law 2540 of 2025 in Colombia, the question is no longer “is it possible?” but “how will it be implemented?”
In this article we demystify the “Robot Judge” and explain how the new regulation of the Arbitral Executive Proceeding (Proceso Ejecutivo Arbitral) integrates technology to speed up receivables recovery without sacrificing legal certainty.
The global picture: where are the “AI Judges”?
Before looking at Colombia, it helps to understand what is happening around the world. There are no robots with full autonomy for complex cases, but there are highly advanced support systems:
- Estonia: the global reference. It uses an AI to resolve low-value contract disputes (under 7,000 euros). The system analyzes documents and proposes a decision that a human can validate or appeal.
- China: its “Internet Courts” operate with virtual judges (avatars) that guide the process 24/7, processing millions of data points to suggest rulings based on prior cases.
- Colombia: we already have precedents. In 2023, a judge in Cartagena used ChatGPT as a support tool to draft a ruling, marking a milestone in the national judiciary.
AI under Law 2540 of 2025: a high-speed copilot
Law 2540 of 2025 opens a clear opportunity for the use of AI in Executive Arbitration Tribunals. The possibility of using these tools is clear in at least two broad categories:
1. Administrative and clerical work
AI will take on the “heavy lifting” that usually bogs down court cases:
- Deadline monitoring: automatic notifications so that no deadline expires.
- Case file classification: intelligent organization of thousands of electronic invoices and data messages.
- Information identification: quick location of the debtor’s assets and bank accounts to speed up seizures.
2. Support in drafting rulings
AI can help the arbitrator write drafts or summarize evidence. However, the law is firm: the arbitrator must review, verify and take full responsibility for the content of the final decision. AI proposes; the human decides.
Why the human factor remains irreplaceable
Although AI has enormous potential, there are three reasons why the “Human Judge” remains the pillar of the system:
- Judgment and conscience: an algorithm can detect a missed payment, but only a human can assess good faith, fraud or the exceptional circumstances of a case.
- Legal responsibility: when there is a procedural error, someone must be responsible. Software cannot be sanctioned or sued; an arbitrator can.
- Ethics and bias: AI models can inherit biases from the data they were trained on. Human oversight ensures that justice is fair.
The future is “Augmented Arbitration”
At Recu we do not see AI as a replacement for lawyers or judges, but as a superpower that lets justice move as fast as modern business. Law 2540 of 2025 opens the possibility for Colombia to be at the forefront on this matter, so that recovering your receivables depends not on the speed of a pen, but on the precision of an algorithm supervised by experts.
The question for business owners today is not whether they trust robots, but whether they are willing to keep waiting years in an analog system when digital justice is already a reality.
Do you want your company to be part of the new era of digital collection? At Recu we help you move your enforcement processes to the arbitral model, backed by the best technology.
Schedule a consultation with our LegalTech experts
